Posted on 2 Comments

Black marlin caught in shark nets off Durban

Black marlin caught in shark nets off Durban

Caught in the shark nets. It happens all the time. Dolphins. Whales. Turtles. Even huge kob and couta. Fall victim to the indiscriminate slaughter with gill nets. Randomly executed by the Kwazulu Natal Sharks Board.

And this beautiful young black marlin is also now dead too. All for what? There are so many practical measures you can put in to effect, other than gill netting, to curb shark/human interactions. If you look closely, there is a bite mark amidships the marlin’s body. This is how more and more animals get caught up and die. Feeding on fish already trapped in the suffocating nets. These nets kill thousands each year. Meshed by professional crews with top notch killing equipment. Always with new boats, outboards and land cruisers. Petrol. In 1990, these guys had 44.4 km of gillnets covering 14% of the 326km coastline, between Richards Bay and Mzamba. Can you believe that?

Their annual average catch between 2009 and 2014 was a good 441 sharks killed per year. They kill an average of 26 Great Whites. And it’s very difficult to find out how many dolphins and other cetaceans are killed. Turtles. Fish…

And there are a host of players out there nowadays, selling all sorts of technological solutions, that can be applied at any beach. Any surf spot. At a fraction of the cost.

For many years, we have campaigned against shark nets. And there was light at the end of the tunnel with shark POD technology developed in co-operation with the bungling Natal Sharks Board. They stopped the distribution under their own directive in 2001. And stuck with the murderous gill nets.

Black marlin caught in shark nets off Durban
Black marlin caught in shark nets off Durban. It takes four bungling government entities for this to happen. Thanks to Chris Leppan of Umhlanga, who put this on our desk.

Here is a list of the shark protection devices, that cost a marginal tiny amount of what it costs to kill sharks at a beach for one year. The beaches could ALL be equipped with these devices, and even given out freely for the public to use (with an ID Card of course). Or even rented. The money that the bloated Natal Sharks Board and the failing Ezimvelo uses, could absorb these costs from savings by pulling out the nets and meshing teams.

https://sharkshield.com/

 

http://www.sharkprotection.com.au/

And a very cool video showing the results of extensive testing done with the infamous Great White Shark…by Shark Shield. It CLEARLY is the way to go.

There are many more products now using the exact same principles and technology that the Natal Parks Board could have harnessed all those years ago. There have been many attacks in this time. That, if they could have been avoided by implementing these breakthrough technologies, are squarely the fault of the Natal Sharks Board.

Sonar instead of shark nets

Then when we realised the beaurocratic mess the board was tied up in, we tried to help. We proposed rigging beaches with off the shelf sonar equipment rather. Fish finders. Feed this data back to a control station, and we can eliminate human shark encounters by monitoring for big animals and alerting the bather public with flag signals and alarms. It never went forward like the rest of the world did. They had this information more than a decade back and refused to use it.

Enter the Clever Buoy. Here is a special device that uses sonar technology and can easily detect sharks in order to operate early warning systems. The system is already deployed extensively and is a proven way to protect humans and sharks at the same time.

We presented the exact technology to the Natal Sharks Board over a decade ago. Extensive research and presentations. Went through many unfruitful meetings. Were eventually sidelined. And this technology too was lost to the Australians.

The latest chapter in the future of our marine life is that the KZN clown show are attempting to marry the two failing organisations – the Natal Parks Board, and Ezimvelo. The scandals within Ezimvelo are enough to run a soap opera with. And the fact that the abominable Natal Sharks Board, an illegal organisation that operates exactly like a fishery, gill nets, licenses, and all, is beyond me. Wood for the trees. But they also can’t keep up with their expenses.

Now we have DAFF taking Ezimvelos job too. The main players in the debacle are 1. the KZN Government to start with, 2. the Government Department doing the job of the 3. Government Organisation that is supposed to protect the sharks and the 4. Government Organisation that is supposed to kill the very same sharks – all in the same series!

Stay on this channel!

More articles with more facts about the Kwazulu Natal Sharks Board and their R60 million or more budget are right here…

https://thesardine.co.za/2015/06/01/why-the-natal-sharks-board-lies-all-the-time/

https://thesardine.co.za/2015/07/20/how-to-stop-the-natal-sharks-board-from-killing-our-sharks/

 

 

Share
Posted on Leave a comment

Statement regarding the transfer of marine and coastal responsibility from Ezemvelo to Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF)

Statement regarding the transfer of marine and coastal responsibility from Ezemvelo to Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF)

Coastwatch KZN actively promotes best practice in Integrated Coastal Management and is deeply concerned by the stated intention of Government to transfer responsibilities for marine and coastal issues from Ezemvelo KZN-Wildlife to the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries with effect from end June 2016.

Coastwatch’s particular concerns are for Monitoring and Compliance issues and in particular the roll-out of Marine Protected Areas.
We believe that the Monitoring and Compliance function exercised by Ezemvelo should be strengthened rather than transferred. Ezemvelo currently also has responsibility for monitoring vehicles on the beach. which includes all Boat Launch sites in KwaZulu-Natal. As part of their function they administer the collection and distribution of data from the Catch Registers completed by each fishing boat which launches. Coastwatch is concerned at the potential loss of the knowledge base and experience of Honorary Officers, who have been acting in a voluntary capacity for decades on behalf of Ezemvelo. Their local knowledge, passion and years of experience they bring to their voluntary positions could be wasted, unless a plan is urgently put in place to ensure a smooth transition from Ezemvelo to Fisheries.

Coastwatch would like assurances that that an approved protocol for the breaching of estuaries, which currently is administered by Ezemvelo, will be adhered to and enforced.

As part of Operation Phakisa, South Africa proposes to implement an overarching, integrated ocean governance framework aimed at balancing the economic opportunities of the ocean space while maintaining its environmental integrity. Key outcomes include an enhanced and coordinated enforcement programme, a National ocean and coastal information system and national ocean and coastal water quality monitoring programme as well as the creation of a Marine Protected Area (MPA) representative network with accompanying research and monitoring programme.

To date Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife have played, and must continue to play, a crucial role in the roll-out of the MPA network as well as the development of the National Framework for Marine Spatial Planning in terms of their National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act 2003 (Act 57 of 2003 conservation mandate.

The removal of the ‘marine compliance mandate’ from this long standing, scientifically rigorous, KZN based state agency will therefore be in direct conflict with the intent of the supposed ‘integrated’ ocean governance system – which includes a coordinated enforcement programme.
>
>
>
> Issued by Coastwatch
>
>
>
> ENDS/

> For more information please contact:

> Roderick Bulman

> Coastwatch KZN 135-408 NPO

> Chairperson

> 8 Pepworth Road, Pietermaritzburg, 3201

> T: 033 386 4465

Share